Check to see if the specified object, left, matches, and report the result in
the returned MatchResult.
Check to see if the specified object, left, matches, and report the result in
the returned MatchResult. The parameter is named left, because it is
usually the value to the left of a should or must invocation. For example,
in:
list should equal (List(1, 2, 3))
The equal (List(1, 2, 3)) expression results in a matcher that holds a reference to the
right value, List(1, 2, 3). The should method invokes apply
on this matcher, passing in list, which is therefore the "left" value. The
matcher will compare the list (the left value) with List(1, 2, 3) (the right
value), and report the result in the returned MatchResult.
the value against which to match
the MatchResult that represents the result of the match
Compose this matcher with the passed function, returning a new matcher.
Compose this matcher with the passed function, returning a new matcher.
This method overrides compose on Function1 to
return a more specific function type of Matcher. For example, given
a beOdd matcher defined like this:
val beOdd = new Matcher[Int] { def apply(left: Int) = MatchResult( left % 2 == 1, left + " was not odd", left + " was odd" ) }
You could use beOdd like this:
3 should beOdd 4 should not (beOdd)
If for some odd reason, you wanted a Matcher[String] that
checked whether a string, when converted to an Int,
was odd, you could make one by composing beOdd with
a function that converts a string to an Int, like this:
val beOddAsInt = beOdd compose { (s: String) => s.toInt }
Now you have a Matcher[String] whose apply method first
invokes the converter function to convert the passed string to an Int,
then passes the resulting Int to beOdd. Thus, you could use
beOddAsInt like this:
"3" should beOddAsInt "4" should not (beOddAsInt)
Trait extended by objects that can match a value of the specified type. The value to match is passed to the matcher's
applymethod. The result is aMatchResult. A matcher is, therefore, a function from the specified type,T, to aMatchResult.Creating custom matchers
Note: We are planning on adding some new matchers to ScalaTest in a future release, and would like your feedback. Please let us know if you have felt the need for a matcher ScalaTest doesn't yet provide, whether or not you wrote a custom matcher for it. Please email your feedback to bill AT artima.com.
If none of the built-in matcher syntax satisfies a particular need you have, you can create custom
Matchers that allow you to place your own syntax directly aftershouldormust. For example, classjava.io.Filehas a methodexists, which indicates whether a file of a certain path and name exists. Because theexistsmethod takes no parameters and returnsBoolean, you can call it usingbewith a symbol orBePropertyMatcher, yielding assertions like:Although these expressions will achieve your goal of throwing a
TestFailedExceptionif the file does not exist, they don't produce the most readable code because the English is either incorrect or awkward. In this case, you might want to create a customMatcher[java.io.File]namedexist, which you could then use to write expressions like:One good way to organize custom matchers is to place them inside one or more traits that you can then mix into the suites or specs that need them. Here's an example:
Note: the
CustomMatcherscompanion object exists to make it easy to bring the matchers defined in this trait into scope via importing, instead of mixing in the trait. The ability to import them is useful, for example, when you want to use the matchers defined in a trait in the Scala interpreter console.This trait contains one matcher class,
FileExistsMatcher, and avalnamedexistthat refers to an instance ofFileExistsMatcher. Because the class extendsMatcher[java.io.File], the compiler will only allow it be used to match against instances ofjava.io.File. A matcher must declare anapplymethod that takes the type decared inMatcher's type parameter, in this casejava.io.File. The apply method will return aMatchResultwhosematchesfield will indicate whether the match succeeded. ThefailureMessagefield will provide a programmer-friendly error message indicating, in the event of a match failure, what caused the match to fail.The
FileExistsMatchermatcher in this example determines success by callingexistson the passedjava.io.File. It does this in the first argument passed to theMatchResultfactory method:In other words, if the file exists, this matcher matches. The next argument to
MatchResult's factory method produces the failure message string:"The " + failureMessageSuffix,If the passed
java.io.Fileis a file (not a directory) and has the nametemp.txt, for example, the failure message would be:For more information on the fields in a
MatchResult, including the subsequent three fields that follow the failure message, please see the documentation forMatchResult.Given the
CustomMatcherstrait as defined above, you can use theexistsyntax in any suite or spec in which you mix in the trait:Note that when you use custom
Matchers, you will need to put parentheses around the custom matcher when if followsnot, as shown in the last assertion above:tempFile should not (exist).Other ways to create matchers
There are other ways to create new matchers besides defining one as shown above. For example, you would normally check to ensure an option is defined like this:
If you wanted to get rid of the tick mark, you could simply define
definedlike this:Now you can check that an option is defined without the tick mark:
Perhaps after using that for a while, you realize you're tired of typing the parentheses. You could get rid of them with another one-liner:
val beDefined = be (defined)Now you can check that an option is defined without the tick mark or the parentheses:
You can also use ScalaTest matchers' logical operators to combine existing matchers into new ones, like this:
Now you could check that a number is within the tolerance (in this case, between 0 and 10, inclusive), like this:
When defining a full blown matcher, one shorthand is to use one of the factory methods in
Matcher's companion object. For example, instead of writing this:You could alternately write this:
Either way you define the
beOddmatcher, you could use it like this:You can also compose matchers. If for some odd reason, you wanted a
Matcher[String]that checked whether a string, when converted to anInt, was odd, you could make one by composingbeOddwith a function that converts a string to anInt, like this:Now you have a
Matcher[String]whoseapplymethod first invokes the converter function to convert the passed string to anInt, then passes the resultingInttobeOdd. Thus, you could usebeOddAsIntlike this:Matcher's variance
Matcheris contravariant in its type parameter,T, to make its use more flexible. As an example, consider the hierarchy:Given an orange:
The expression "
orange should" will, via an implicit conversion inShouldMatchers, result in an object that has ashouldmethod that takes aMatcher[Orange]. If the static type of the matcher being passed toshouldisMatcher[Valencia]it shouldn't (and won't) compile. The reason it shouldn't compile is that the left value is anOrange, but not necessarily aValencia, and aMatcher[Valencia]only knows how to match against aValencia. The reason it won't compile is given thatMatcheris contravariant in its type parameter,T, aMatcher[Valencia]is not a subtype ofMatcher[Orange].By contrast, if the static type of the matcher being passed to
shouldisMatcher[Fruit], it should (and will) compile. The reason it should compile is that given the left value is anOrange, it is also aFruit, and aMatcher[Fruit]knows how to match againstFruits. The reason it will compile is that given thatMatcheris contravariant in its type parameter,T, aMatcher[Fruit]is indeed a subtype ofMatcher[Orange].